Jim Murphy MP

Have your say Jims Blog

You are here: Home / Interactive Services / Blog

Friday, 16th Jan 2009

Heathrow and The Mace

Yesterday was an eventful day in Parliament but I missed it because as I was in Scotland all day. But the announcement of the new third runway at Heathrow was an important one. I welcome it as long as the environmental protections that are pomised are in place. The work to ensure that "green slots" for flights now has to take place.
How irresponsible of the Tories today to warn possible investors off of investing. They seem to think that they are actually in power.
It was also fascinating to see on TV John McDonnell MP seize the Mace. I walk past the Mace every day in Parliament as I walk past the Dispatch box. It is also the main feature in the daily Speakers procession. It is the symbol of Parliament's authority. To read a little more read the BBC text on it below.



Mace - Commons

The mace is a silver gilt ornamental club of about five feet in length, dating from the reign of Charles II.

It symbolises the royal authority by which Parliament meets and also the authority of the Speaker.

On each day that the House is sitting the mace is carried to the chamber at the head of the Speaker's procession by the Serjeant at Arms.

It is placed on the table of the House, except when the House is in committee, when it rests on two brackets underneath the table.

Interfering with the mace constitutes gross disorderly conduct and is a contempt of the House.

Heseltine wields the mace

Michael Heseltine famously seized the mace after a particularly heated debate in 1976.

The evening of 27 May proved to be a particularly eventful one for the House of Commons.

The government was attempting to steer its Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Bill through the Commons.

The Bill was hotly contested, with Michael Heseltine leading the Conservative opposition. The vote on an amendment had been tied, and was lost on the Speaker's vote. The vote on the main government motion - which one would have expected also to be tied - was in fact carried by the Labour Government.

At this, some of the Welsh Labour MPs began to sing 'The Red Flag'. Heseltine, infuriated by the traditional Labour Party anthem, grabbed the mace and held it over his head.

He was restrained by Jim Prior, replaced the mace and left the Chamber. The Speaker suspended the sitting until the following day.

The next morning Michael Heseltine apologised unreservedly for his behaviour.

Post a comment
Wednesday, 14th Jan 2009

Has football finally gone mad?

Has football finally gone mad?

How else do you explain the news that Man City might be launching a £100 million bid for Kaka?  It is suggested but I can’t believe the plan is to pay him 250,000 per week in wages (after tax).

This valuation is more than the value of the entire teams of both sides of the Old Firm combined. Would you get 3100 million for the line ups of both teams from the recent Old Firm game at Ibrox? Sadly, I don’t think so.

This type of behaviour by a foreign owner of a football team is in stark contrast to the American owner of Aston Villa who sees to be taking a sensible long term approach. This talk of a £100 million bid reminds of a child with a computer football game making silly bids because it’s only a make believe game. In truth this type of transfer, if the talk is true will contribute to ruining the wonderful sport of football.

But I guess if you are a Man City fan (as my wife Claire is) then maybe you’re delighted.

Post a comment
Wednesday, 7th Jan 2009

Rely on Russia for gas?

I have spoken a lot about the need for the UK to try to be energy independent by having a balanced energy policy including clean coal, nuclear, renewables and oil and gas. I have said it is perhaps the one strategic challenge for the Uk which gets least comment and attention publicly despite all the work that the Govt is doing.
But for those who sometimes wonder why I am so keen on this look again at Russia's actions.
We need to be energy independent as an island. We can't be reliant on erratic Russian gas supplies.
Heres how todays Guardian is reporting the story.

Russia-Ukraine gas crisis intensifies as all European supplies are cut off

Gazprom, the state-owned Russian gas group, today cut off all supplies to Europe travelling through Ukrainian pipelines, intensifying the political and economic crisis that has arisen out of a payments dispute between the two countries.

Amid evidence that people in eastern Europe are being deprived of heating as the Arctic cold snap continues, Russia and Ukraine continued to blame each other for the deadlock.

Gazprom accused Ukraine of shutting down the fourth and last open pipeline crossing the country while officials at Naftogaz, Ukraine's state energy firm, simply said: "Words fail us."

The complete shutdown comes ahead of top-level talks in Moscow tomorrow between Gazprom and Naftogaz executives to resolve a pricing dispute that has arisen in each of the last four years. Ukraine, semi-bankrupt and being bailed out by the IMF and EU, is being offered natural gas at higher prices, but substantially below those charged on European markets.

The dispute, viewed by the EU as a purely commercial one until recently, threatens a fresh breakdown in relations between Brussels and Moscow, with European Commission officials warning that Russia's reputation as a reliable partner is once again at stake.

But analysts point out that, since the last serious crisis broke out in 2006, Europe has done very little to avert shortages. Instead of creating an integrated market, drawing on alternative energy supplies, countries have simply drawn up individual contracts with Gazprom, increasing dependence on Russia.

Russia supplies a quarter of Europe's gas and 80% of this transits through Ukraine. As shortages hit western Europe and intensify in the south and east, EU governments will meet on Friday to consider sharing supplies held in storage.

Post a comment
Wednesday, 7th Jan 2009

Can Obama really meet expectations?

With less than two weeks to go until he becomes the President of the United States expectations of him are enormous. His campaign was optimistic and fresh. His style of politics seems to be different. And a candidate that many of his opponents branded as "lightweight" has proven himself to be of real substance but can he achieve all that many people expect of him?
His To Do list includes
The American and world economy
The Middle East
Climate Change
America's relationship with the rest of the world
His domestic priorities on health care and education
Achieving a stable rules based world order
and much more
Do you think that expectations have been raised to high or can Obama achieve real change?
In the words of his now famous campaign slogan I believe that "Yes He Can"
What do you think? Post a comment or vote on my on line poll so that I know what local people think.

Post a comment
Wednesday, 7th Jan 2009

Upto the minute news from Gaza

I have supported the demand for a cease fire and in doing so described the situation in Gaza as heartbreaking. It must surely be time for the killing to stop.
It is also important to be able to get as much up to date information as possible on the events on the ground so I have lasted some of the best quality media and organisational links for you to read the very latest from these sites which are continually updated.
To access each site simply click on the blue text


Israeli newspaper Haaretz

Aljazeera TV

Jerusalem Post newspaper

The British Foreign Office

United Nations

Read below the statement I have issued
It is Time for the Killing to Stop

Jim Murphy MP has declared “It is time for the killing to stop” in the “heartbreaking” situation in the Middle East. In a statement on the crisis in Gaza Jim Murphy has added his calls to the demand for a ceasefire.

Jim also added “There must be a ceasefire. It is crucial that this time the ceasefire is permanent. We have too many temporary ceasefires in the Middle East and this one when it comes must last. There has been too much bloodshed in recent years. Israelis have lived under the constant threat of rocket attacks from Hamas out of Gaza with a total of 6,000 being fired at Israeli civilians over the years. Now ordinary civilians in Gaza are suffering. The scenes of mothers and fathers mourning the deaths of their children are heartbreaking. No-one could fail to be moved by the scenes of devastation.

We also have to remember that Israel has to protect it’s citizens against Hamas which is a vile terrorist organisation that is committed to the destruction of Israel. They have provoked this tragedy.

Post a comment
Tuesday, 30th Dec 2008

Did this really happen in 1978?

Today government papers from 1978 are released under the 30 year rule. This is the day that the newspapers almost write themselves as there is always a treasure trove of stories to publish. So here is the Guardians take on it all. Jim Callaghan took centre stage not surprisingly.
To read the coverage of todays release click here
Post a comment
Friday, 19th Dec 2008

Is Christmas too Commercialised

I have put up a new poll on the site tonight because I was out (starting my) Christmas shopping and I noticed there was not a trace of the story and meaning of Christmas in sight. In fact I didn't even notice many Christmas cards that had any religious significance. So is this a reason to worry or is it just the way the world is? But what do you think? Is Christmas too commercialised? Are we losing site of the actual reason for Christmas? Or is your view that the wider meaning of Christmas is only something that those of us who go to Church should worry about and only in our Churches? Post a comment or vote in the poll.
Post a comment
Thursday, 18th Dec 2008

America - a Nation of three Dynasties

Caroline Kennedy is hoping to replace Hilary Clinton as a senator because Clinton has moved on as part of the post Bush reshuffle sums up the three dynasties of US politics. The Kennedy's, the Clinton's and the Bushes. While I don't like inherited power I am still a bit of a sucker for the Kennedy story. The article below from the Guardian online is interesting.

Caroline Kennedy

Caroline Kennedy at the presentation of a children's book about her father, John F Kennedy. Photograph: Brian Snyder/Reuters

As political debuts go, it was not an entirely brilliant start: Caroline Kennedy, America's most famous political daughter, ducking the television cameras to dive into a waiting black four-wheel drive, only moments after announcing she wanted a seat in the Senate.

The awkward scene offered a new take on Kennedy. Was this the fairytale ending at last for the erstwhile princess of Camelot, the survivor of a family that suffered more than its share of assassination, cancer, and tragic accidents? Or was this an example of Park Avenue privilege claiming what it saw as its due?

Or, in yet another twist, was Kennedy following in the footsteps of Hillary Clinton, the woman she is seeking to replace in the Senate, trading on name recognition and family connections to make her entry into elected politics?

The truth is, for a woman who has been a celebrity from her birth 51 years ago, the public knows relatively little about Kennedy's personality or her politics — beyond the broad assumption that she is by birthright a Democrat.

That is by design: people who know or have worked with Kennedy in New York describe a woman who is almost self-effacing in public, rarely initiates conversations at charity events, and has never sought publicity for her efforts on causes such as helping to raise $350m (£230m) for the city's public schools.

She has a horror of interviews. Her late mother, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, once wrote about her daughter that she reflexively threw her hands in front of her face whenever she saw a camera.

So it is perhaps a measure of Kennedy's seriousness that within a few hours of that inglorious flight from reporters, she was standing her ground and making her case to replace Clinton when she leaves the Senate to take up her post as secretary of state.

"I've spent a lifetime growing up around public policy issues, and public service is something I'm proud of in the family tradition," Kennedy told reporters in Buffalo yesterday. "It's something that I've always wanted to do."

She showed little shyness in setting out her qualifications. "I've worked in New York City public schools. I've written books on the constitution, I've raised my family, and now it's time, I think, with the problems we have, for me to be able to step forward and do more," Kennedy said.

The twin encounters were themselves evidence of Kennedy's grasp of the mechanics of winning elections in New York. Though the state's governor, David Paterson, has sole authority to choose Clinton's replacement, the successful candidate will have to run in a special election in 2010.

But Hank Sheinkopf, the veteran New York political consultant, was unimpressed. "It's not a great start," he said. "In order to be a great candidate you have to accept one simple fact: that you can lose, and you can be beaten in a general election. She hasn't got that. She has never even been in combat. She has got a ways to go."

Kennedy's trip to Buffalo shows she understands that campaigning starts immediately. As soon as she signalled she wanted the Senate seat, Kennedy engaged a well-regarded political strategist, Josh Isay — who is also working for the Israeli Likud leader, Binyamin Netanyahu.

She began courting women's organisations: one of her first calls on Monday was to an abortion rights group, indicating she will be strongly pro-choice.

Kennedy also borrowed a page out of Clinton's successful manual for political neophytes seeking state-wide office in New York by making yesterday's pilgrimage to the un-glamorous areas upstate that account for 40% of the vote.

Faye Wattleton, a long-time women's activist and president of the Centre of Advancement for Women, said Kennedy had never demonstrated the same commitment to women's issues as Clinton. She also doubted Kennedy's ability to operate outside of elite circles in Manhattan. "She is a New York City creature. There is no evidence, or little evidence, that she has any support upstate."

But in most other ways, Kennedy is the anti-Clinton, says a former New York City official who has worked with Kennedy. Clinton, who was also accused during her first run for the Senate in 2000 of trading on her husband's credentials, spent her adult life immersed in policy details. But as her disastrous experience in steering health care reform in the 1990s showed, Clinton was not naturally adept at building political friendships or networking.

Kennedy, it is believed, understands that process almost instinctively — but lacks Clinton's depth of understanding on the issues.

"She is really spectacular at politics, but she really doesn't know about policy," said the former official. "But she can network and she can fundraise. Everyone who works with her says she is really smart and that is half the battle."

Others who have worked with Kennedy in fundraising for New York schools say she is a hard worker, although she did not oversee the efforts on a daily basis.

Kennedy was just five when her father was assassinated, and has lived most of her life since then on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. She attended Harvard University and Columbia law school, and married the artist and designer Edwin Schlossberg, whose firm has designed exhibits for the Brooklyn Museum and the college basketball hall of fame — although she never officially changed her name.

The couple have three children: two daughters and a son. Her daughters are now away at college, freeing up Kennedy for public life.

After the death of her mother in 1994 and the plane crash that killed her younger brother, John, in 1999, Kennedy became the last surviving member of her branch of the clan.

She did not practice law full-time but wrote and edited seven books — including one on the right to privacy.

She also became a regular fixture at the American Ballet Theatre, as its honorary chairwoman, and at charity events in New York.

But throughout, Kennedy was conscious of her responsibility as her father's sole surviving heir, and the keeper of his legacy. She took an active role in the John F Kennedy Library Foundation, and in selecting those honoured by his Profiles in Courage award.

She remained close to her uncle, the senator Ted Kennedy, who assumed the role of walking Kennedy brides down the aisle after his brothers were shot.

And she never — despite her privacy — entirely ruled out a run for public office in her own right. "I don't have any plans to do that right now," she said in a 2002 interview. "My kids are young."

But until this year, Kennedy rarely participated in politics unless it involved her family or other close connections. She joined the rest of the Kennedy clan on stage at the 2000 Democratic convention. She campaigned with John Kerry's daughters in the 2004 elections.

That changed after a meeting with Barack Obama in 2007, when Kennedy sought for the first time to use her influence in a Democratic primary. In an opinion piece in the New York Times early this year, she said Obama reminded her of her father's effect on politics.

Together with her uncle, Kennedy began appearing at campaign events, from small colleges to big arenas in Los Angeles.

"This is a bit unusual for me because I generally don't get involved in politics," Kennedy told one Obama rally in Texas.

Post a comment
Friday, 12th Dec 2008

A real honour today

Its 5.20am on Friday and I'm in Glasgow Airport awaiting a flight to Amsterdam and then on to Germany for an event that I'm looking forward to with a mixture of anticipation and honour. I am visiting the Royal Scots Dragoon Guards at their base in Germany. Many have just returned from Iraq and Afghanistan.I will officially be presenting them with their Campaign Medals and will meet them and their families. Regardless of the different views about the Iraq war there can only really be one view of the men and women we sent to both countries. They are real heroes and we are rightly proud of them.
Post a comment
Friday, 12th Dec 2008

Death on TV

I cant be the only one is unsettled by the broadcasting of a man's death on TV. I didn't watch it so some people might think I have no right commenting on it. But I just don't feel that it is right. I'm sure that the gentleman and his family were doing it for what they believed to be the best of reasons and they were faced with great pain.
But I don't believe in assisted suicide nor broadcasting the end of some ones death in this way.
Post a comment

Showing pages 10 of 22

website by Hudson Berkley Reinhart Ltd